The Diabetes Forum Support Community For Diabetics Online banner
1 - 2 of 2 Posts

· Registered
2,057 Posts
WASHINGTON -- Who needs leafy greens and carrots when pizza and french fries will do?
In an effort many 9-year-olds will cheer, Congress wants pizza and french fries to stay on school lunch lines and is fighting the Obama administration's efforts to take unhealthy foods out of schools.
The final version of a spending bill released late Monday would unravel school lunch standards the Agriculture Department proposed earlier this year. These include limiting the use of potatoes on the lunch line, putting new restrictions on sodium and boosting the use of whole grains. The legislation would block or delay all of those efforts.
The bill also would allow tomato paste on pizzas to be counted as a vegetable, as it is now. USDA had wanted to count only a half-cup of tomato paste or more as a vegetable, and a serving of pizza has less than that.
Nutritionists say the whole effort is reminiscent of the Reagan administration's much-ridiculed attempt 30 years ago to classify ketchup as a vegetable to cut costs. This time around, food companies that produce frozen pizzas for schools, the salt industry and potato growers requested the changes and lobbied Congress.
School meals that are subsidized by the federal government must include a certain amount of vegetables, and the USDA's proposal could have pushed pizza-makers and potato growers out of the school lunch business.
Piling on to the companies' opposition, some conservatives argue that the federal government shouldn't tell children what to eat. In a summary of the bill, Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee said the changes would "prevent overly burdensome and costly regulations and . . . provide greater flexibility for local school districts to improve the nutritional quality of meals."
School districts have said some of the USDA proposals go too far and cost too much when budgets are extremely tight. Schools have long taken broad instructions from the government on what they can serve in the federally subsidized meals that are given free or at reduced price to low-income children. But some schools have balked at government attempts to tell them exactly what foods they can't serve.
Reacting to that criticism, House Republicans had urged the USDA to rewrite the standards in a bill passed in June. The Senate last month voted to block the potato limits in its version, with opposition to the restrictions led by potato-growing states. Neither version of the bill included the latest provisions on tomato paste, sodium or whole grains; House and Senate negotiators added those in the last two weeks as they put finishing touches on the legislation.
The school lunch proposal is based on 2009 recommendations by the Institute of Medicine, the health arm of the National Academy of Sciences. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said they are necessary to reduce childhood obesity and future health care costs.
USDA spokeswoman Courtney Rowe said Tuesday that the department will continue its efforts to make lunches healthier.
"While it's unfortunate that some members of Congress continue to put special interests ahead of the health of America's children, USDA remains committed to practical, science-based standards for school meals," she said in a statement.
Nutrition advocate Margo Wootan of the Center for Science in the Public Interest said Congress's proposed changes will keep schools from serving a wider array of vegetables. Children already get enough pizza and potatoes, she says. It also would slow efforts to make pizzas -- a longtime standby on school lunch lines -- healthier, with whole grain crusts and lower sodium levels.
Congress is "making sure that two of the biggest problems in the school lunch program, pizza and French fries, are untouched," she said.
A group of retired generals advocating for healthier school lunches also criticized the spending bill. The group, called Mission: Readiness, has called poor nutrition in school lunches a national security issue because obesity is the leading medical disqualifier for military service.
"We are outraged that Congress is seriously considering language that would effectively categorize pizza as a vegetable in the school lunch program," Amy Dawson Taggart, the director of the group, said in a letter to lawmakers before the final bill was released. "It doesn't take an advanced degree in nutrition to call this a national disgrace."

Congress pushes back on healthier school lunches |

This article appeared in The Cleveland Plain Dealer, and was also on Here is our Government at its best. Sad, sad, sad.

· Registered
2,057 Posts
Discussion Starter · #2 ·
Here is the comment I left regarding this article at

This type of mentality will create more and more individuals to become diabetic, and then they will tell you that you caused your diabetes from being lazy, eating poorly, and not caring. There are those in this world who have no choice but to eat those foods that have too many chemicals, carbs, and sugar in them. Eating a healthy diet is quite expensive, and even those of us who have two working adults in the household have to budget, cut coupons, and watch for sales in order to even attempt to eat healthy. Government is not making anything easier on the American public. They are all living high off the hog, while we continue to grow more and more obese, lazy, and diseased because they want to provide "pizza" as a vegetable! Then, when these same poor working class people grow to be diabetic, and the government subsidized healthcare tells them they will only pay for this much for diabetic supplies and medications, while still pushing an overall unhealthy diet by the ADA, we will begin to see many more deaths and low quality of life people in this country of ours. Can I still say it is the Great Country that it used to be? Nope. I cannot make that comment anymore. Not sure anywhere else is better, but we sure are taking the Great out of the USA. Very sad.
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.